|
The lebanese are celebrating the return of michael Aoun,the man who was
supported by Saddam hussein in the past,responsible for killing and
kidnaping thousands of lebanese and syrians.
The Bands Leader has been living in France,where he found a cozy refuge
since the eighties(save your white coins for your dark days the arab Wisdom
tells).
What is happened to the World?the Answer is evident!
Fance and Russia were angry because of the american political Seizure of
Irak and other Gulf countries.Both Countries have exercised Pressure over
the americans since the US-invasion made them lose their Business
there.(Russia signed shortly before the Invasion a 45 billion Dollars
project with Saddam hussein)
The Position of the French and Russia encouraged Syria to strengthen the
Opposition to the US-Politics in Irak,and that all made the insurgency
Tendencies against the Invasion Forces (psychologically at least)grow
higher,which helped the french make the Pressure more effective.
The Consequences:A french american Settlement forced Syria to Withdraw its
Forces from Lebanon,and made Lebanon a political and strategical space for
France in exchange for the french Silence over US-political Role in Irak
and other Gulf Countries(The same was done in 1916 between England and
France).
The french gave up playing the Troubles Maker for the americans.But what is
about Russia?
In order to make that more practical,the exploited Syria became isolated
through the US-embargo and the french Lebanon Politics.The Isolation of
Syria made the russians have their corner in the Middle East as well.The
Threat that Syria faced and is still facing,made Syria look for a Veto
Protection inside the Security Council.Russia with its Veto status and
permanent Memebership in the Security Council,has been attracting Syria.So
Syria fell in the russian Hand.
A chinese official declared last week;that Syria is doing well,and
emphasized the Baath political Role in making the syrians politically and
economically blossom.
The Division:The Brother (Lebanon)declared loyalty to France(Many Members
of the lebanese House of Representatives affirmed that),The
sister(Syria)turned to Russia,America and England Stretched their Wings
over the the Rest of the Brothers in the Gulf Countries.
What could Syria do to prevent that Division?the Syrian national Arabism
seems to be turning practically into a Syrianism through the mentioned
shrinkage.The Syrian national Party is the Model of that stream.
What will happen if Syria stops defending the arab Interests,and focus on
its own Interest?that would mean standing against the Nature of the
arab,which is thought to be born in according to michael Aflak(1),and not
merely acquired.
Let us turn then to the Question of the Know how,namely how to defend the
arab Interest?and what has the syrian Government been doing to achieve such
a policy?
The 12000 syrian Soldiers that we lost in Lebanon,should have achieved with
their sacrificed Lives some arabism Goals,but the result shows us triumphal
lebanese declaring their independence from Syria,and considering the
Syrians as an Occupation Force.Their french Auspice,direct them in
according to some francophonic Notes.
So the syrian sacrificed 12000 Martyrs,but the french have reaped the
political Influence.
In 1958,the syrian Baath Party dissolved itself,to make the Unity with the
poor Egypt possible,but the result was:Exploiting Syria through the
Egyptian Nassirists.
In 1973(again),Syria and Egypt declared the War against Israel,and wanted
to recapture the Golan Hights and Snai,but the egyptians declared the Cease
fire and left Syria alone in the Battlefield,to be forced to withdraw from
the freed Land.The Syrians entered Lebanon to rescue the Maronites in he
year 1976 from being killed and marginalized by the Palastinian
fighters,but the strongest opposition to the syrians came from the
Maronites later.The lebanese in general,have been provoking Syria since the
Assassination of the former PM Alhariri.Lebanese officials declared the
need for Reforming the syrian system politically and economically.
Many House Representives and Oppositionists have been affirming:that their
bad relation to the syrian Government doesn’t harm the good relation
between the lebanese and the syrian People,but what they did indeed
was;Killing the syrian Workers and kidnaping the syrian People.
The Palastinians hated Syria because of marginalizing their Role in Lebanon
and striking their Forces at Alzatar Hill,but never loved Syria when syrian
armed Forces rescued them from being completely massacred by King hussein
of Jordan,and never thanked Syria for protecting them and the lebanese in
1982 in Lebanon,or building and financing their Militias and Organizations
in all over the arab World.The PLO went to discuss Peace separately,despite
the syrian pushy demand,to make the peace tallk a two parties Talk.
The Palastinian Fatah and other Organizations projects,seem to be turning
into some drifting Projects,dominated lastly by the US-role in the Middle
East.
That is to say;that the governmental national political Investments in the
Arabism Field hasn’t been thriving well.
The question that the syrian Government should be asked is:why should all
that syrian Sacrifice of Money and Lives be trampled and gone,without any
positive impact?and why should the fruit of our historical effort go to the
french or some other claimed Peace Auspices?
The answer we do know…The syrian Government would say:those treacherous
Arabs.
That was expressed even by the president Baschar Alassad in his last
Parliament Talk,through which he declared the withdrawal from Lebanon.
That Answer seems to be right,but it is not the justification of being fell
in the hand of the trecherous and exploiting Arabs or foreigners.The
politicians are asked to achieve success and not justify defeat or bring
some ethical interpretations of the political Unfortunes.
The President Baschar Alassad has been financing Lebanon with free
electricity and infrastructure since he was elected,and that philanthropism
responds to the Philosophy of Albaath party,and the Philosophy of the arab
Nationalism.But does the Keynesianism of Baschar Alassad arab policy bear
the responsibility for the political Loss in Lebanon and some other Parts
of the arab World?
The truth is:there are no treators in the arab World,but interpreneuring
Bands,Kings and Dictators,whose will predominate and overstep the Will of
the good arab People, whose loyalty to the common arab interest is supposed
to be natural.
The Effort of the syrian Assads could thrive if the arab Countries were
democratical. The mentioned Interpretation is possible,but can not justify
the Misery of course.
A further question:was it possible for Syria to prevent the Division in the
Middle East?I would say Yes.If Syria didn’t stand against the Invasion of
Irak,we would have the free Hand in Lebanon,and would be in a good relation
to the United States as well.Our Position as a peace Party would have been
growing stronger,and the israeli Role would have been growing weaker since
then.The french would never be able to set feet in Lebanon or in the rest
of the Middle East,if we were in a good relation to the United States.The
russian Weapons would not have been needed,and the syrian economy would
have been doing better.The strategical Baath goals would have been more
trusted,America wouldn’t suppress the arab Nationalism,if the arab
Nationalism is not turning against the americans.
If we will not be in a better relation to the United States in Case of
neutrality or Support of the Invasion,we wouldn’t be in a worse Position
although.
Question:Is it ethically justified to support the Invasion or stay
neutral?This question seems to be confusing.A possible Answer:Supporting
the Removal of Saddam Hussein is justified through the following facts:
Saddam Hussein has been harming the arab and syrian Interests through his
Actions. In the eighties,he trained and sent some islamic extremists to
Syria(Homs),where they blew some civilian bus and Vehicles up in the
air.Terrorist were trained in Irak,to accomplish their Terror Missions
inside Syria.
The Last and most decisive Point is:We(Syrians)should not accept the Will
of some who want us to stay on the opposite Side.During th soviet Empire we
were on the opposite Side of the Division,the poor Side,while we are
politically,strategically and economically rich.We had to,because we were
in need for Weapons,to fight willinglessly in a War that was originally and
strategically not our.
Today,there is no Communism Empire.The Veto Club is planing to find a reaon
or cause of placing us on the opposite Side,which may make a cold division
possible.
There is no doubt;that this strategy is the goal of the Veto Syttem.The new
Trick is to mediate and bring the Muslim Brotherhood Org. Members back.
That will link us to the Alkaida,and insure some additional Links to
China,north Korea,and some other Martionettes.it is the alternative for the
Division Cause that was based on Communism and Capitalism in the Past.
The only way to escape those Dirty Plans and cold fuck is:don’t let the
Muslim Brotherhood Organization come back without becoming punished,resume
the Peace dialog with Israel,improve the relation to the United States,and
in Case of being forced to stay on the opposite Side,that would mean;a
declaration of war against us,and our Answer should be in that Case
Friedrich Nietzsche.
(Theory:some opposition Friends find that provoking Syria through Lebanon
is a french Plan,aims to make Syria take some military actions,which may
justify a french March supported by the americans and Israelis,and that
would make the Division more Real.A good theory.Believe that the bad french
Capitalism would look some how for some Wars to solve the french Crisis.As
you see;french products have been bocoming uncompetitive in the last
Decades,and the “grand Nation”hasn’t been consumed as such on the Market
Levels.I see that this theory is good,but the Idea is too weak;simply
because a french march would cost the french a higher cost than income)
Some syrian politicians are responsible for the political Loss,they should
avoid Making the Country refall in the Net of some international political
Tricks.
Mr Baschar Alassad should rethink about his Administration Team,those who
are responsible for the whole political Misery.They should give up,and it
has been a political Tradition,hat those who don’t win,give up.Two days
ago,Mr howard,(the Leader of the Opposition Party in the UK)resigned.He
didn’t justify his defeat ethically,but saw that the political Defeat or
uncompetitiveness is enough reason for resigning and leting some others do
the Job.Those who are responsible for our political loss in Lebanon and
some other political Fields,should resign.
We don’t regret the Withdrawal from Lebanon,but the political misery,that
made the Bands from Yesterday,be leading the lebanese Society today,and the
colonial France, be the claimed freedom Cause of the 14th April
lebanese.The international Neocolonialism,with a new cold Version of the
S.B Agreement(16th of may 1916), should stop stretching roots in the Middle
East.
(1)Michael Aflak is one of the Founders of Albaath Party.
|